External content might be used on this page. Please refer to the note at the bottom of this page.

Humanitarian policy: The highs and lows of 2019 so far

There’s no shortage of controversies and challenges for the humanitarian sector this year: from biometrics to Brexit, or from counter-terrorism to countering sexual abuse.

Set-piece UN policy discussions wrapped up in Geneva on Wednesday with an unusual dispute. US diplomats wanted to change the wording of an annual resolution that summarises the international agenda on humanitarian response. They wanted new anti-abortion language. A compromise text could not be agreed, and the US changes were rejected by a public vote.

As well as the formal UN event, this week saw a flurry of side-meetings among donors, and NGOs. 

Time then for a select reading list to mark the gatherings. Topics we covered this year on the policy beat include innovation, cash-based aid, fraud, Venezuela, Ebola, and fragile states

We looked back to Rwanda 1994. We profiled local relief operators, and USAID investigators.  

And, in the coming weeks, we’ll be taking stock of the “nexus”, the Grand Bargain, and other reforms, as well as keeping on top of data protection debates and all the latest innovations. 

We always welcome tips and feedback. Don’t hesitate to get in touch with topics or documents you think need an airing. You can reach me at my contacts above.


US anti-abortion push flops in Geneva

In a departure from diplomatic consensus, the Trump administration tried – and failed – to insert anti-abortion language into a UN resoluton on meeting humanitarian needs. 

It’s time for “innovation” to change

“It doesn’t matter how many gizmos you fund if those in power in the system don’t see real incentives for change”

How can Oxfam – and the aid sector – root out sexual abuse and exploitation?

What a high-powered panel found in a year-long enquiry into the troubled NGO

Biometric standoff in Yemen aid fraud row 

Hungry civilians find themselves caught in the middle of a UN insistence on biometric ID.

What Brexit means for UK NGOs and foreign aid

A guide to how Brexit could affect the UK government’s humanitarian spending, British NGOs, and the EU’s aid arm, ECHO.

New UN deal with data mining firm Palantir raises protection concerns

The UN’s food agency says it can become more efficient and save costs with a no-cost deal with a controversial US security and intelligence contractor.

Q&A: Top US aid fraud investigator defends tough counter-terror stance

USAID’s watchdog clamps down on corruption and saves taxpayers millions, but critics say its rigid policies also deny aid to those in need.

Director’s Dispatch: Aid and the elite

A Davos reality check from Heba Aly on billionaires and philanthropy: “Are we really going to shift the needle like this?”

(TOP PHOTO: A staff member helps with preparations in the General Assembly Hall at the United Nations in New York.)

Since you’re here, would you mind taking this very quick survey?

In an effort to increase the sustainability, impact and independence of our work, we’re exploring new and better ways for our readers to engage with and support our journalism.

Specifically, we want to gauge your appetite for a voluntary membership model that would help you contribute to our mission through more engagement and/or voluntary financial contributions.

We’d be very grateful if you could spare a moment to complete this quick survey to inform our way forward.

Source Article from http://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/feature/2019/06/27/humanitarian-policy-highs-and-lows-2019-so-far
Humanitarian policy: The highs and lows of 2019 so far
TNH English
The latest 10 articles published on The New Humanitarian

Note that external content is often used in creating news articles on this site. If you want to use the content, please ensure that the relevant source is referenced, as indicated at the end of the article.
Also note that, although we source high-quality content, we cannot verify or be held accountable for the accuracy of external media content. News articles also do not necessarily reflect the views or opinion of the NEPAD Water Centres of Excellence Network