Follow us on TwitterFollow us on Facebook
External content might be used on this page. Please refer to the note at the end of news articles.

Cape Town and Joburg come to the party for solid waste minimisation

SOUTH AFRICA:

The diversion of waste to landfill is not only a focal point for municipalities in South Africa, but is also a drive across the globe – in particular in developed countries. Experts in this country are of the opinion that disposal must be a last resort and that waste be seen as a potential resource that can be utilised in such a way that it enhances environmental protection and socio-economic change.

And so, both the Cities of Cape Town and Johannesburg have, in response to this global trend, put out tenders for precisely this. Johannesburg’s waste generation is on the increase and airspace of the landfills is depleting at an accelerated rate. The City is consequently exploring alternative waste treatment technologies that have the potential of significantly reducing waste going to its landfills. The City’s infrastructure and services department has requested an expression of interest from those who“have the experience and knowledge of implementing waste treatment technologies that will assist the City in dealing with its challenges. The ultimate objective of the procurement process will be for the City to enter into a partnership with a preferred bidder in the planning, designing, financing, building and operating of a proposed alternative waste treatment technology project.”

The City of Cape Town has a similar request but has tendered for a feasibility study“for the identification of investment measures as part of an Advanced Solid Waste Treatment System which would introduce modern and innovative waste treatment technologies in the City of Cape Town.” The study is to concentrate on the identification and assessment of treatment options defining frameworks for “waste treatment technologies prior to waste disposal in combination with an assessment of the potential of the developed measures for activities (biological treatment) under the Clean Development Mechanism(CDM).” The study however, should exclude the on-going activities to develop CDM landfill gas projects for the existing landfills.

Traditional methods of diverting waste to landfill include the options of recycling or re-using materials or products that are suited to these options. Thermal treatment, better known as incineration, is another method of landfill diversion and is used extensively in both the EU and the US. The bottom line is that biodegradable waste should be diverted from landfills due to the capacity to generate methane and contribute to climate change. Methane has around 21 times the capacity of carbon dioxide to cause global warming. Cape Town’s request for biological treatment options in line with the CDM includes an avoidance of anaerobic digestion on landfills. The mechanism suggested is aerobic treatment through composting and proper soil application of the compost, and anaerobic digestion in closed reactors that are equipped with biogas recovery and a combustion and/or flaring

 

Source Article from http://www.infrastructurene.ws/2012/10/25/cape-town-and-joburg-come-to-the-party-for-solid-waste-minimisation/
Cape Town and Joburg come to the party for solid waste minimisation

http://www.infrastructurene.ws/2012/10/25/cape-town-and-joburg-come-to-the-party-for-solid-waste-minimisation/

http://www.infrastructurene.ws/feed/

Infrastructure news

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Note that external content is often used in creating news articles on this site. If you want to use the content, please ensure that the relevant source is referenced, as indicated at the end of the article.
Also note that, although we source high-quality content, we cannot verify or be held accountable for the accuracy of external media content. News articles also do not necessarily reflect the views or opinion of the NEPAD Water Centres of Excellence Network